In-House Crew vs Managed Production Staffing: Cost, Risk, and Coverage Compared

Jan 29, 2026  |  by Todd Mason

Every organization that produces live or recurring video eventually faces the same question: Should we build an in-house production team, or partner with a managed staffing provider? On paper, the in-house option often looks appealing.

Read More Start Discussion

Every organization that produces live or recurring video eventually faces the same question:

Should we build an in-house production team, or partner with a managed staffing provider?

On paper, the in-house option often looks appealing. Hire full-time staff, avoid agency fees, and build culture internally.

In practice, many organizations underestimate the true cost and operational risk of owning a fixed production team in a highly variable industry.

Between recruiting delays, retention challenges, training costs, and the inflexibility of fixed headcount, what seems like the cheaper option often becomes the most expensive long-term liability.

Before you post that job requisition, it’s worth understanding the real tradeoffs.

1. The Talent Magnet Problem: Where do top pros want to work?

Top-tier broadcast talent is drawn to environments with scale, variety, and cutting-edge workflows. That typically means production companies, not corporate job boards.

Highly skilled technical directors, audio engineers, and operators want to stay sharp. They want exposure to different shows, formats, and equipment. A static corporate studio can feel limiting, even if the compensation is competitive.

The Recruiting Reality:

The BMG Advantage: We are a Tier-One Recruiting Engine. Professionals want to work with BMG because we live and breathe live production. Our Production Staffing division maintains a nationwide bench of vetted professionals, enabling us to source and place talent swiftly and bypass the 44-day lag.

2. The “Fully Burdened” Cost Fallacy (OpEx vs. CapEx)

An Full-Time Employee salary is just the tip of the iceberg. When finance leaders compare an agency rate to an hourly salary, they often miss the hidden operational costs that drive the real price up by 25% to 40%.

The True Cost of Ownership:

audio sliders

3. Agility & Coverage: Scaling without Friction

Production demand is rarely consistent. Town halls, earnings calls, product launches, and major announcements create sudden spikes in staffing needs, followed by quieter periods where a full team sits idle. Fixed headcount struggles in both directions.

The real risk shows up when coverage matters most. If a lead engineer is unavailable on the day of a CEO’s global address, an in-house team is often left scrambling to find a last-minute freelancer who doesn’t know the workflow, the systems, or the expectations.

Managed production staffing removes that risk. Because teams are backed by a bench of trained operators who already understand your environment, coverage is built in. PTO, illness, or unexpected schedule changes don’t translate into production risk.

The same advantage applies to scale. A routine three-person flypack can quickly expand into a twenty-person crew for a product launch or investor event, then scale back down just as easily. You pay for the coverage you need, when you need it, without carrying unused headcount in between.

4. Retention & Career Progression: Avoiding the Turnover Loop

A single corporate studio offers limited upward mobility. Once a technician masters your setup, they often get bored. This leads to the “Dead End” risk, where your best talent leaves for new challenges, triggering the expensive turnover cycle.

The Cost of Turnover: Replacing a skilled employee can cost 33% to 200% of their annual salary in recruitment, onboarding, and lost productivity.

The Managed Solution:

todd control room

5. Culture Integration: Outsiders vs. Embedded Partners

The biggest fear of managed services is “losing the culture.” Leaders worry that outsourced staff will be “checked out” mercenaries. In our experience, the opposite is true.

The Embedded Model:

Conclusion: Don’t Turn Your Media Team Into a Recruiting Agency

The choice isn’t between control and flexibility.

Managed production staffing offers the consistency of an embedded team with the agility and depth of a specialized provider. It removes recruiting risk, reduces fixed costs, and ensures coverage when it matters most.

Instead of spending time writing job descriptions and managing turnover, organizations can focus on what actually moves the needle: content, messaging, and strategy.

Ready to build your dream team? Contact BMG to discuss a Staffing Assessment today.

You May Also Like

Start Discussion

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top